Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
LiteCache's latest activity
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
@neikoloves I've created a special FAQ for you so you can get an idea of what LiteCache Rush is and what it's good for. If you have any...
Friday at 8:31 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
Open your mind. ;) The internet provides other indicators to distinguish between good and bad guys. Using IP addresses for filtering is...
Friday at 5:33 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
LiteCache is a registered trademark, and most LiteCache solutions are either based on or designed exclusively for LiteSpeed. LiteCache...
Friday at 5:25 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
It's not a question of trust. You're trying to protect yourself, and that's fine, but the method you're using to protect yourself is...
Thursday at 1:29 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
I wish you the best of luck in your search for alternatives. However, you probably won't have any luck, because the WordPress community...
Thursday at 1:18 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
While concealing your identity through various means might enhance your safety, it also increases the risk of being identified as a "bad...
Thursday at 1:07 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
The country doesn't matter in your case, so again, request cachecrawler.com host and tell me your IP address.
Thursday at 12:51 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
The last block with rayID 9a8b0552c8be97ed was detected by an user that has Chrome version 109. This version in combination with other...
Thursday at 12:47 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
The reason you are being blocked: You are using a Chrome browser version that has been considered outdated since 2023.
Thursday at 12:21 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
I'm sorry again if you're still blocked. We don't use CF filter rules, but rather custom rules that have proven effective for 20 years...
Thursday at 12:12 PM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
Sorry for the block. Unfortunately, you're using an access provider that many "bad guys" use, but you should now have unrestricted...
Thursday at 6:50 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
LiteCache Rush: WordPress Performance by Prevention
.
Would you please tell me which country you are from?
Wednesday at 8:48 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
set_time_limit(3600 * 48); but process ever run only by three hours, how fix that?
.
@neikoloves Before we talk about your post, we need to clarify what you are referring to, because the topic of this thread is...
Wednesday at 8:39 AM
LiteCache
replied to the thread
exists a file to config "LSAPI_MAX_PROCESS_TIME" for all server? where it is?
.
LSAPI_MAX_PROCESS_TIME This variable must be set and changed in web server configuration and cannot be defined in .htaccess. Just read...
Nov 25, 2025
LiteCache
replied to the thread
set_time_limit(3600 * 48); but process ever run only by three hours, how fix that?
.
LiteSpeed Enterprise (LSWS) uses LSAPI_MAX_PROCESS_TIME Environment Variable...
Nov 25, 2025
Home
Members
Top