Today I am offered v1.8.2-2.el9
Does this address the issues discussed here, or something else?
It would be much nicer if we got an announcement when package updates are released.
But if it is an EOL package why is it a dependency of the v1.8.2-1.el9 openlitespeed rpm?
I would be much happier if the dependencies were for the generic packages such as php-litespeed provided by the remi repos.
I run PHP v8.2 or 8.3 on my sites, why should Litespeed insist I install 7.4?
Yes it is good. An announcement somewhere here when the RPMs are updated would be even nicer.
On the subject of RPMs, litespeed-update repo may need an update, lsphp74-mysqlnd.x86_64 is at version 7.4.32-2.el9 but 7.4.33-2.el9 has been released for around 1 year in the Remi repo I think.
I just noticed that my Rocky 9 servers have been updated to LiteSpeed/1.8.2 Open (BUILD built: Sat Oct 26 04:05:54 UTC 2024).
I am not sure when it happened, but have not noticed any changes.
My server which is running a couple of small sites on OLS was subject to an apparent DDOS attack last night, which was successful in that it took my sites offline, but the only (obvious) reason that the attack succeeded is that the OLS error log was filled with the lines:
2024-08-15...
I am currently running openlitespeed 1.7.19-5.el9 from the OpenLiteSpeed repo, but expected v1.8.0 (at least) to be available by now.
Have I overlooked something?
A couple of hours later...
At [23/Aug/2021:04:54:33 +0000], web server with pid=7925 received unexpected signal=11, a core file is created. A new instance of web server will be started automatically!
Please forward the following debug information to bug@litespeedtech.com.
Environment...
My Centos 7 server recently updated openlitespeed to 1.7.13-1.el7 from the litespeed repository and the server started sending emails with the subject "LiteSpeed Web server /usr/local/lsws/bin/openlitespeed on #machine-name-redacted# restarts automatically to fix 503 Errors".
These emails are...
I am setting up ols on a site for which there is no cache-control plugin. I think that I should be able to make it work using .htaccess rewrite rules.
I have written a couple of rules which should provide public caching of the site front page for users who do not have a logged-in cookie. So...