Search results

The Dashboard reporting problem went away after a VM reboot.

I just updated but only with /usr/local/lsws/admin/misc/lsup.sh -v 1.8.2, otherwise I reinstalled 1.8.1. Right now the Dashboard says nothing is working but everything appears to be fine??

VM is easier. Docker is a dog. Adds complexity that's not necessary.

Docker? Why?

Something has gone horribly wrong!

As Yogi Berra would say, “the less available a package is, the more popular it becomes.”

SFTP

It's probably easier to use Lima on MacOS (either hardware platform) to install OLS on to a supported Linux distro running a VM

Thanks. I will give this a test. Regarding support for Fedora, this is a philosophical conversation and needs to be examined along with the goals of the Litespeed project. Right now, Apache and Nginx are universally supported out of the box on, I assume, on all Linux distros and even MacOS. So...

Thanks for this. Just to be 100% clear, I just need to add 'fedora' to line 35 like below? I notice there is code to add the Epel repo(s) which would be superfluous for Fedora. Will the shell script be able to handle that? if [ "${REPO_OS}" = 'centos' ] || [ "${REPO_OS}" = 'rhel' ] || [...

I tried the source install a while back and it also didn't work. The best method is using RPMs

Also, OLS won't start without installing one more rpm: dnf install libxcrypt-compat

Thanks. In order to test Fedora with ols1clk, I will have to make a special VM for it because when it fails it scatters stuff everywhere and then the VM is not really usable. I will give it a shot in a few days. But the OLS repository is not Fedora compatible. I installed Fedora with the RPMs...

Also, I can't figure out the criteria for posting the new/updated RPMs in Index of /centos/9/x86_64/RPMS/ Index of /centos/9/update/x86_64/RPMS/ Right now they seem to be organised correctly for new stuff, but previously some updated stuff was in one directory while other updated stuff was in...

The answer was there blowing in the wind https://docs.litespeedtech.com/lscache/lscwp/troubleshoot/#wp-cron-issues

BTW as you now have an ARM64 release, it would be great to have an ARM64 compatible repo. Thanks PS FYI I got OLS working on Rocky and Alma 9 using UTM on my MBA M2. wget -O - https://repo.litespeed.sh | sudo bash --2023-06-27 18:18:17-- https://repo.litespeed.sh/ Resolving repo.litespeed.sh...

OK. We are at Fedora 38 now. And a different version of OLS. And this is not 1-Click. Because Fedora is on top of the Centos mountain now, compatibility with it would make supporting the whole RHEL community much easier, I think. These Distros are nothing to sneeze at: Fedora, Alma, Rocky...

OK thanks. Please communicate my suggestion about Fedora. Fedora server is really good. Comes with well supported Cockpit, VM and containers (Podman). Using Alma now for OLS, close but not quite the same. Also there is a longstanding bug in 1-Click with MariaDB and the repo key which shuts down...

Still waking up. Is this a link to LS or OLS?

Is "5/24" installed in 1-Click? Also what's it with the Debian/Ubuntu love? Fedora is better but OLS/LS doesn't work outside of a container. Have to use downstream RHEL compatible distros.